Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 So. 2d 621 - Ducote v. Couvillon

401 So. 2d 621 - Ducote v. Couvillon’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kinchen v. Kinchen · 343 So. 2d 444 - Lighthouse Life Ins. Co., Inc. v. Rich · Cook v. Ed Francis Chevrolet, Inc. · Illinois Central Gulf Railroad v. International Harvester, Inc. · 361 So. 2d 971 - Copellar v. Yount

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our opinion the first sentence of the cited article allows the recovery of damages for the ‘wrongful issuance’ of a temporary restraining order on a motion to dissolve or on a reconventional demand, irrespective of the fact that when the demand is made the wrongfully issued restraining order has already expired by its terms. The second sentence of the cited article allows the inclusion of attorney’s fees as an element of such damages only for services rendered in connection with the dissolution of a restraining order or preliminary injunction. Therefore, we conclude that if the wrongfully issued restraining order has already expired when the demand for dissolution is made, damages are recoverable but attorney’s fees are not.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.