¶1ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
¶2The writer has concluded that information as to the whereabouts of the prostitute was, under the facts in this case, “a valuable thing” and that the evidence is *257sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction for kidnapping under Article 1177a, supra.
¶3The state’s motion for rehearing is accordingly granted; the opinion reversing the conviction is set aside, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.