Combellick v. Rooks’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. Conner (1967), Nolan v. Nolan (1990)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Long v. Mild · Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Co. · Shepard v. Harris · Branscum v. Glaser · Kickham v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““3. Please state whether you or anyone acting on your behalf took the testimony of the witnesses who testified in the trial of State of Missouri vs Clarence E. Mueller in the Magistrate Court of Johnson County Missouri on or about July 18, 1969 and whether any notes taken at said trial have been transcribed and furnished to you or your counsel. “4. If your answer to interrogatory number 3 is in the affirmative' state the name of the reporter or person who took the notes and transcribed the testimony of the witnesses testifying at said trial, the address of such reporter and the charge made for the services. “5. If your answer to interrogatory number 3 is in the affirmative state’the name and address of every witness whose testimony has been taken, transcribed and furnished to you or your counsel. “6. If your answer to interrogatory number 3 is in the affirmative attach copy or copies of the transcript of the testimony of said witnesses to your answers hereto.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.