Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 S.W.2d 62 - Warner v. Ward

Warner v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2019

9 state decisions

40196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skaggs v. Gannon · Ferguson v. Klein · Dudley's Adm'r v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If 'sufficient reason is shown there may be a revocation before final judgment.’ ”). . Although the consents do not state that the birth parents, in fact, consent to the proposed adoption, see supra note 3, Moore and Doming do not argue otherwise. The Court of Appeals's mention of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) that her consent to the adoption had been procured at a time when she was a minor and had no advice from anyone but her mother and her mother’s attorney, was without means to provide for the baby, and was under extreme pressure, (2) that she had now married the child’s father, and (3) that she and her husband desired to and could provide adequate support and care for the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he report was filed on February 24, 1965. The hearing was held on March 3, 1965, at which time the trial court stated that [t]he report was in the record. Hence it is clear that it was available for inspection by the parties and their attorneys. Cf. KRS 199.570(1). It is but two pages long, and could have been read and digested without delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.