Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 SW2D 852 - Miller v. Burke

Miller v. Burke’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1967
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Compton v. Elliott · Swanson v. Swanson · Lynch v. Millican

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ 'It is well settled that with the venue challenged, under proper plea, by one sued without his county, the burden not only to allege, but to prove that the case is within one of the exceptions to the statute rests on plaintiff * * * and to defeat the plea of privilege, he must both plead and prove the facts relied on to bring the case within one of the exceptions. The issue made is tried in the ordinary way, and the truth as to the facts in issue is to be ascertained by the introduction and weighing of evidence offered by both sides. In short, a plaintiff seeking to maintain venue in another county must prove by a preponderance of the evidence the facts that bring his cause within one of the exceptions to Article 1995.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““There being no evidence whatsoever in the statement of facts that the accident occurred in Harris County, Texas, plaintiff has wholly failed to carry his burden, and the judgment of the trial court is accordingly reversed and rendered ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ »”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““We have carefully read the statement of facts and we find no evidence whatsoever in the statement of facts stating that the accident occurred in Houston or in Harris County, Texas.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.