In Re Hudson’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2001
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Leis v. Flynt · White v. Morgan · Eugene W. Tyler v. Trammell E. Vickery, Ralph Banks, Jr. v. Trammell E. Vickery, James E. C. Perry v. Edward S. Sell, Jr. · In Re Reardon · In re Golby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An applicant shall be deemed to have passed the bar examination by any one of the following minimum standards: (i) A scaled score of 130 on the MBE 1 and an average of 65.0 on all the essay questions on the bar examination; or (ii) A scaled score of 155 on the MBE without regard to the score on the essay questions on the bar examination; or (iii) An average of 75.0 on all the essay questions on the bar examination without regard to the score on the MBE.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Petty
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.