Tzantarmas v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
402 F.2d 163 · 1968
Citation profile
25 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 1999 · most notably United States v. Rose (1978), United States v. Bedore (1972)
25 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Ogden v. United States · Paternostro v. United States · Brandow v. United States · United States v. Adler · Dear Wing Jung v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“stigma of deporation, enables [him] to select his own destination, and, most importantly, facilitates the possibility of return to the United States.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.