Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 F.2d 367 - David L. Joseph v. James H. Rowlen

David L. Joseph v. James H. Rowlen’s Empirical Analysis

402 F.2d 367 · 1968

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
August 1994
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently August 1994 · most notably Hampton v. Hanrahan (1979), Whirl v. Kern (1968)

50 federal appellate · 5 district ·

6901968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monroe v. Pape · Beck v. State of Ohio · Pierson v. Ray · Tenney v. Brandhove · Michael Cohen v. Russell K. Norris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “against the background of tort liability that makes a man responsible for the natural consequences of his actions.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[Wjhere a police officer makes an arrest which is unlawful under the federal constitution, because made without a warrant and without probable cause to believe that the person arrested had committed or was committing an offense, sec. 1983 imposes on the officer a liability which is recoverable in federal court. Additional circumstances coloring the officer’s action as flagrant or malevolent are not required.” 402 F.2d at 370 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.