Davis v. Ciccone’s Empirical Analysis
402 F.2d 475 · 1968
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Davis · Weber v. Steele, Warden, U.S. Medical Center (Two Cases) · Haynes v. Harris · Joseph Orby Smith, Jr. v. Dr. R. O. Settle, Warden, Appelle · Glenn v. Ciccone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The purpose of Section 2255 was to require a federal prisoner to exhaust his remedies in the courts of the District and Circuit in which he was convicted and sentenced, and to apply to the Supreme Court, on certiorari from a denial of such remedies, before seeking release on habeas corpus. This means that he must exhaust all the ordinary remedies available to him before applying for an extraordinary remedy.” See also: Humphries v. Ciccone, 428 F.2d 477 (8th Cir. 1970) Weber v. Steele, 185 F.2d 799, 800 (8th Cir. 1950).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hughes v. Ciccone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.