Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

402 F.2d 477

Docket No. 12469.

United States v. Batten

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 28, 1968.

Decided Oct. 31, 1968.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-10-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1968

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1968-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Edward Delk, Norfolk, Va. (court-appointed counsel), for appellant.

¶2Roger T. Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty. (C. V. Spratley, Jr., U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

¶3*478Before BOREMAN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Having been convicted of bank robbery-in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), Earl William Batten appeals. Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument, we find no error. The conviction is affirmed.

/402/f2d/477 · .json · Public domain