Mull v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
402 F.2d 571 · 1968
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2005 · most notably United States v. Nelson (1969), United States v. Hiland (1990)
37 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113 · 18 U.S.C. § 1152 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 3242
Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Bolling v. Sharpe · Shelley v. Kraemer · Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia · McLaughlin v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, the general laws of the United States as to the punishment of offenses committed in any place within the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, except the District of Columbia, shall extend to the Indian country.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““We deal here only with this appellant and the offense of which and the statutes under which he was convicted. We express no opinion as to other offenses, or as to the effect of later amendments to the statutes as they relate to an offense committed after their enactment.” 402 F.2d at 573 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the moving papers [made] no showing of prejudice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.