United States v. Capaldo’s Empirical Analysis
402 F.2d 821 · 1968
Citation profile
59 federal appellate · 14 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2007 · most notably United States v. Marion (1971), United States v. Mandujano (1976)
59 federal appellate · 14 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on United States v. Ewell · Nelson v. County of Los Angeles · Matter of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for Harry a Groban and Nathan Groban · Weiss v. United States · United States v. Winter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the prosecution is not required to offer the defendant's entire grand jury testimony so long as 'the statements admitted are given sufficiently in their context so as not to confuse the trier.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“not essential to a fair and impartial understanding of the statements read.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.