Fausett v. Murner’s Empirical Analysis
402 F.2d 961 · 1968
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2018
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co. · Fyne v. Atlas Supply Co. · In re Brill · In re Fant · Walsh v. Lockhart Associates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““actual knowledge of the claim on the part of the trustee or even a receiver has, in the presence of persuasive reasons of equity, induced the courts to overlook the fact that a formal proof, in the technical sense, had not been filed in time.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Where there are enough facts appearing in the record to establish claim against the bankrupt, it may, in a proper case, be used as a basis for amendment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the Court be informed by its own files of the existence, nature and amount of the claim ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Murchison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.