Benn v. Greiner’s Empirical Analysis
402 F.3d 100 · 2005
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Kyles v. Whitley · Penry v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Howard v. Walker“had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Howard v. Walker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.