Fernandez v. Artuz’s Empirical Analysis
402 F.3d 111 · 2005
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Houston v. Lack · Michael Wayne Williams v. John Taylor Warden · Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Carey Warden v. Saffold · Burns v. Morton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.