Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 F.3d 116 - Moshier v. United States

Moshier v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

402 F.3d 116 · 2005

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
October 2023
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably United States v. Prows (2006), Burrell v. United States (2006)

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

200200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Houston v. Lack · Clay v. United States · Kapral v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final; (2) the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by governmental action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was prevented from making a motion by such governmental action; (3) the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or (4) the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Moshier did not file a direct appeal from the judgment, possibly because he had waived his right to appeal in a plea agreement.”). 23 . Id. at 118 . 24 . 358 F.3d 424 , 424-25 (6th Cir.2004) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “judgment becomes final when the time for filing a direct appeal expires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.