Associates of Hampton v. J’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
October 2016
most recently cited
9 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 327 · 11 U.S.C. § 544 · 11 U.S.C. § 723
Relies on Rome v. Braunstein · O'NEIL v. Bergan · In Re Watman · In Re Frank Schifano · McMullen v. Sevigny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e have considered remanding the case to the district and bankruptcy courts for further factfinding... but see no need to impose ... on the courts' time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.