Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 N.J. Super. 430 - Brunson v. Affinity Fed. Credit Union

402 N.J. Super. 430 - Brunson v. Affinity Fed. Credit Union’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc. · Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors · Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of Education · Di Cosala v. Kay · Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and Developers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Affinity and Wilcox had a duty of care to plaintiff. That duty included the duty to conduct a reasonable investigation before initiating criminal proceedings against the person whose stolen identity was used to open the account. The injury to plaintiff was foreseeable; a juiy may well find that defendants breached their duty of care and that breach proximately caused plaintiffs injury. [ Brunson, supra, 402 N.J.Super. at 453 , 954 A.2d 550 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.