State v. Grover’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Crews · Gates v. State · State v. Cermak
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““... an appeal from a judgment of conviction is not the most appropriate way of raising an issue concerning the effectiveness of the trial counsel’s representation because the reviewing court does not have the benefit of all the facts concerning why defense counsel did or did not do certain things.” State v. Hanson, 366 N.W.2d 377 (Minn.App.1985); see also State v. Grover, 402 N.W.2d 163 (Minn.App.1987), and cases cited therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ricehill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.