Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 PA 164 - Commonwealth v. Ladd

Commonwealth v. Ladd’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
17
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Valeriano v. Bronson (1988), Commonwealth v. Tarver (1981)

57 state decisions — followed in 17 states

240196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ball v. United States · Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co. · Commonwealth v. Redline · Commonwealth v. Drum · Commonwealth v. Bolish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] rule becomes dry when its supporting reason evaporates”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In cases of murder the rule at common law undoubtedly was that no person should be adjudged “by any act whatever to kill another who does not die by it within a year and a day thereafter....” And such is the rule in this country in prosecutions for murder, except in jurisdictions where it may be otherwise prescribed by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The rule cannot, therefore, be said to be part of the definition of murder, either in Blackstone or in Pennsylvania. Nor do we see any reason in principle for reading Blackstone's addendum into the body of his definition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.