Sollinger v. HIMCHAK’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably 226 Pa. Super. 381 - ELDRIDGE Et Ux. v. MELCHER (1973), Marks v. Bell Tel. Co. of Penn. (1975)
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kuhns v. Brugger · Schofield v. Druschel · MARTIN v. Arnold · Matthews v. Derencin · Samuels v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““One does not have the absolute right to turn into or cross another lane of traffic and may do so only after signaling an intention so to do and first having reasonably assured himself that, by his so doing, others using the highway will not be placed in danger of injury: Martin et al. v. Arnold, 366 Pa. 128 , 77 A.2d 99 (1950)." Sollinger v. Hemchak, 402 Pa. 232, 236 , 166 A.2d 531, 534 (1961).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.