402 Pa. Super. 502 - Commonwealth v. McFarlin’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki · Klusman v. Bucks County Court of Common Pleas · Johnson v. COM., PA. BD. OF PROB. & PAR. · Commonwealth v. Martin · Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There shall be a right of appeal in all cases to a court of record from a court not of record; and there shall also be a right of appeal from a court of record or from an administrative agency to a court of record or to an appellate court, the selection of such court as to be provided by law; and there shall be such other rights of appeal as may be provided by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.