Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 SC 458 - Barnes v. Johnson

Barnes v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville · Whiteside v. CHEROKEE CTY. SCHOOL DIST. · Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. One · Columbia Wholesale Co. v. Scudder May N.V. · Rushing v. McKinney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus, promissory estoppel has broad applicability to prevent injustice, but where a promise is unclear or the alleged harms are unconnected to the inconsistent disposition, the doctrine does not risk imposing its own inequity against the party sought to be estopped.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Unlike a contract which requires a meeting of the * minds and consideration, promissory estoppel looks at a promise, its subsequent effect on the promisee, and in certain cases bars the promisor from making an inconsistent disposition of the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Specifically, the doctrine's elements represent a balancing between affording a remedy where contract law cannot, and ensuring the doctrine's application is not, itself, an inequity against the party estopped.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.