Barnes v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville · Whiteside v. CHEROKEE CTY. SCHOOL DIST. · Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. One · Columbia Wholesale Co. v. Scudder May N.V. · Rushing v. McKinney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thus, promissory estoppel has broad applicability to prevent injustice, but where a promise is unclear or the alleged harms are unconnected to the inconsistent disposition, the doctrine does not risk imposing its own inequity against the party sought to be estopped.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Unlike a contract which requires a meeting of the * minds and consideration, promissory estoppel looks at a promise, its subsequent effect on the promisee, and in certain cases bars the promisor from making an inconsistent disposition of the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Specifically, the doctrine's elements represent a balancing between affording a remedy where contract law cannot, and ensuring the doctrine's application is not, itself, an inequity against the party estopped.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.