Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 So. 2d 1 - Bell v. State

402 So. 2d 1 - Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Myhand v. State · Cooley v. State · Kissic v. State · Ragland v. State · 370 So. 2d 1108 - Laffitte v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining if a declaration should be allowed in evidence, the trial judge should consider statements of the deceased, the nature and gravity of his wounds, his physical condition, the length of time between the infliction of the wound and death, the cause of death, and all other facts tending to prove the state of mind of the deceased at the time the declaration was made. Bell v. State, 402 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.