402 So. 2d 1078 - Craft v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 1990
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stokley v. State · 361 So. 2d 1106 - Chavers v. State · 363 So. 2d 1001 - Deason v. State · Elam v. State · 55 Ala. App. 581 - Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether appellant is ultimately labeled a principal or an accessory is no longer of consequence in the law of Alabama. Section 13A-2-20 , -23, Code of Alabama 1975 ; Stokley v. State , 254 Ala. 534 , 49 So.2d 284 (1950); Kendrick v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 377 So.2d 1112 , cert. denied, Ala., 377 So.2d 1114 (1979).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“has been rejected in favor of the conventional”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.