Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 So. 2d 1106 - Mauldin v. State

402 So. 2d 1106 - Mauldin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably 411 So. 2d 819 - Slaughter v. State (1981), 584 So. 2d 872 - Holder v. State (1991)

50 state decisions

3201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Andresen v. Maryland · 24 Md. App. 128 - Andresen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'To warrant the reception of an object in evidence against an objection than an unbroken chain of custody has not been shown, it is not necessary that it be proved to an absolute certainty but only to a reasonable probability, that the object is the same as, and not substantially different from, the object as it existed at the commencement of the chain.' "”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to establish a sufficient predicate for admission into evidence, it must be shown that there was no break in the chain of custody of the item.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A party need not negate the remotest possibility of substitution, alteration or tampering with the evidence [Citations omitted].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.