Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 SO2D 1173 - Bowden v. State

Bowden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably 845 So. 2d 74 - Lugo v. State (2003), 765 So. 2d 39 - Gross v. State (2000)

18 state decisions

1101981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gissendanner v. State · Hand v. State · 409 F. Supp. 609 - United States v. Stofsky · 429 F. Supp. 1231 - United States v. Ladmer · Florida Bar v. Byron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “exists. As used in this statute, the word”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “engaging in at least two incidents of racketeering conduct that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission or that otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided at least one of such incidents occurred after the effective date of this act and that the last of such incidents occurred within 5 years after a prior incident of racketeering conduct.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he target of RICO Act prosecutions will be, appropriately, the professional or career criminal and not non-racketeers who have committed relatively minor crimes.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.