McDonnough v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Williams v. State · 372 So. 2d 86 - Smith v. State · 382 So. 2d 395 - Brey v. State · 400 So. 2d 955 - Hicks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) If, at any time during the course of the proceedings, it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or with an order issued pursuant to an applicable discovery rule, the court may order such party to comply with the discovery or inspection of materials not previously disclosed or produced, grant a continuance, grant a mistrial, prohibit the party from calling a witness not disclosed, or enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances. "(2) Willful violation by counsel of an applicable discovery rule, or an order issued pursuant thereto, may subject counsel to appropriate sanctions by the court."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“be properly exercised only after the court has made an adequate inquiry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.