402 So. 2d 66 - Weider v. Weider’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 357 So. 2d 172 - In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Etc. · 345 So. 2d 352 - McAllister v. McAllister · 392 So. 2d 577 - Colucci v. Colucci · Rankin v. Rankin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fla.R.App.P. 9.600 allows the trial court to enter and enforce orders necessary for the protection of a party pending appeal. By awarding the wife the exclusive use and possession of the marital home until July 14, 1983 in the event this appeal is decided prior to that time, the trial court has exceeded its jurisdiction. The trial court losses [sic] jurisdiction upon the filing of a notice of appeal except for those matters specifically enumerated in Rule 9.600, and this rule does not provide for such jurisdiction beyond the pendency of the appeal. (emphasis in original).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“... until July 14, 1983, or a determination of the appeal of the final judgment ... whichever occurs latest in point of time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.