Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 402 SO2D 86 - State v. Rodriguez

State v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2018

4 state decisions

201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haddock v. State · O'Brien v. State · 375 So. 2d 879 - Fowler v. State · State v. Dopson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that the defendant does not actually employ the weapon is not the gravamen of this enhanced offense. There is no requirement that the State must show the person charged intended or was willing to use such weapon in the furtherance of the crime being committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “not the gravamen of this enhanced offense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.