Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 A2D 1206 - Doyle v. Bowdoin College

Doyle v. Bowdoin College’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2021 · most notably International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc. (1991), 119 Wash. 2d 484 - Scott v. Pacific West Mountain Resort (1992)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions — followed in 14 states

90197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Seckinger · 60 Cal. 2d 92 - Tunkl v. Regents of University of California · Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'n · Kroger Company v. Giem · 43 Wis. 2d 36 - Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “expressly spell[ed] out with the greatest particularity the intention of the parties contractually to extinguish negligence liability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Because we do not construe the documents executed ... as releases or indemnification agreements, we have no occasion to reach the further issue whether contractual provisions which relieve a party from liability for that party's own negligence would be unenforceable and void as contravening public policy. See, e.g., Tunkl v. Regents of University of California, 60 Cal.2d 92 , 32 Cal.Rptr. 33 , 383 P.2d 441 (1963); Prosser, Torts § 68 (4th ed.1971).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a parent, or guardian, cannot release the child's, or ward's, cause of action”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.