Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

403 F.2d 1022

Docket No. 26205.

Illinois Central Railroad v. Standard Oil Co.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

2 counsel of record

Relies on Illinois Central Railroad v. Standard Oil Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2005

2 federal appellate ·

2019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Burkett H. Martin, Vicksburg, Miss., Robert Mitten, William F. Bunn, Chicago, Ill., Dent, Ward, Martin & Terry, Vicksburg, Miss., for appellant.

W. E. Suddath, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for appellee.

Before GEWIN and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges, and CHOATE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

In this case the appellant, Illinois Central Railroad Company, claims the right to contribution from the appellee, Standard Oil Company, for one-half of the amount paid by the railroad in satisfaction of a judgment obtained against it by one of its employees pursuant to the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U. S.C. § 51 and the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C. § 4. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi concluded that the appellant was not entitled to contribution and dismissed the complaint, 292 F.Supp. 337. We have thoroughly considered the contentions of the appellant as set forth in its brief and presented on oral argument and conclude that the district court decided the case correctly.

¶2

The judgment is affirmed.

/403/f2d/1022 · .json · Public domain