Odom v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
403 F.2d 45 · 1968
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2313
Relies on United States v. Rabinowitz · Suess v. United States · Odom v. United States · Patton v. State of North Carolina · Marano v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... The absence of an arrest warrant, even though there may be sufficient time to obtain one, does not invalidate an otherwise valid arrest. United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56 , 70 S.Ct. 430 , 94 L.Ed. 653 ; Abramson v. United States (5th Cir.1964) 326 F.2d 565 ; and Dailey v. United States (5th Cir.1958) 261 F.2d 870 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.