United States v. Meyer

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 15, 1968.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-10-15

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1968-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1987

6 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Becker & Moore, (for Meyer), West Covina, Cal., Stephen Adams (for Campbell), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Charles H. Turner, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Ore., for appellee.

¶3Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5In this Dyer Act conviction we hold it was not error to permit one F.B.I. agent to sit at the government table during the trial although he was a witness. The instruction given on guilty knowledge was as good as the one submitted by the defendant, and it was adequate. The trial judge was a little impatient at one point, but the jury was adequately instructed on the point.

¶6Other objections here were not properly made or preserved in the trial court, but we find them without merit.

¶7Judgment affirmed.