Shaw v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
403 F.2d 528 · 1968
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2002 · most notably United States v. Mouzin (1986), Slawek v. United States (1969)
15 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312
Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Lewis v. United States · Pointer v. United States · Stilson v. United States · United States v. Indiviglio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant cannot base a claim of inadequate representation upon his refusal to cooperate with appointed counsel. Such a doctrine would lead to absurd results.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““* * * [B]arring plain error, we will not notice errors raised for the first time in the appellate court, including errors involving a defendant’s constitutional right. Robinson v. United States, 327 F.2d 618 (8 Cir. 1964). Cf. Clay v. United States, 394 F.2d 281 (8 Cir. 1968); and see United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F.2d 276 , 280 (2 Cir. 1965); United States v. Del Llano, 354 F.2d 844 , 847-848 (2 Cir. 1965); United States v. Bolden, 355 F.2d 453 , 458-459 (7 Cir. 1965); Good v. United States, 378 F.2d 934 , 936 (9 Cir. 1967); United States v. Armetta, 378 F.2d 658 , 661 (2 Cir. 1967).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.