Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

403 F.2d 635

Docket No. 18758.

Wells v. Dickinson

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-11-21

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“A bankrupt ordinarily has no interest in conflicts between the trustee in bankruptcy and creditors over the allowance of claims.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including American Bonded Mortgage Co. v. Nicholas, Marlow v. Rollins Cotton Co.

“move the court for an order requiring the trustee to appeal, or for permission to appeal if the trustee declines to do so.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Marlow v. Rollins Cotton Co.

Relies on James Bryson Martin v. Texas · Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. Mack · Caldwell v. Armstrong

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-11-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2015

8 federal appellate ·

40196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Terry L. Hatchett, Glasgow, Ky., for appellants.

E. P. Barlow Ropp, Nunn, Travis & Ropp, Carroll M. Redford, Redford & Redford, Henry H. Dickinson, Glasgow, Ky., for appellees.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellants, who are the bankrupts and an unsecured creditor respectively, have appealed from an order of the District Court dismissing a petition for review of an order of the Referee in Bankruptcy which allowed the claim of appellee, Preston-Ropp Chevrolet, Inc., as an unsecured claim against the bankrupts' estate, in the amount of $30,232.41.

¶2

Appellees have moved to dismiss the the appeal. It is their contention that only the Trustee in Bankruptcy has standing to appeal and that appellants are not "aggrieved" parties within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 67(c) and 11 U.S.C. § 48.

¶3

A bankrupt ordinarily has no interest in conflicts between the trustee in bankruptcy and creditors over the allowance of claims. Edell v. DiPiazza, 345 F.2d 336 (5th Cir. 1965) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 931, 86 S.Ct. 322, 15 L.Ed.2d 342, rehearing denied, 382 U.S. 1002, 86 S.Ct. 572, 15 L.Ed.2d 492; Caldwell v. Armstrong, 342 F.2d 485 (10th Cir. 1965).

¶4

An unsecured creditor ordinarily has no standing to appeal directly from an order allowing the claim of another unsecured creditor. The orderly administration of the bankrupt's estate requires that these matters be worked out through the trustee in bankruptcy, who represents all creditors, and the Bankruptcy Court. If an unsecured creditor objects to the allowance of the claim of another unsecured creditor, he has a remedy. He may move the court for an order requiring the trustee to appeal, or for permission to appeal if the trustee declines to do so. The Court may, upon a proper showing and with such reasonable conditions as he may impose, order the trustee to appeal or permit the creditor to appeal. If relief is denied, the creditor may appeal for an abuse of discretion. Behringer v. Lybrand & Morgan, 270 F.2d 670 (10th Cir. 1959); Rooke v. Reliable Home Equip. Co., 195 F.2d 667 (4th Cir. 1952); Kimm v. Brecke, 149 F.2d 149 (8th Cir. 1945); Ross v. Drybrough, 149 F.2d 676 (2nd Cir. 1945); Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. Mack, 163 F. 155 (6th Cir. 1906).

¶5

The appellants have not shown themselves to be aggrieved. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

/403/f2d/635 · .json · Public domain