Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 F.2d 826 - Phillips v. Osborne

Phillips v. Osborne’s Empirical Analysis

403 F.2d 826 · 1968

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
May 2020
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Stelling v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1547 (1978), Boelens v. Redman Homes Inc & Boelens (1984)

32 federal appellate · 8 district ·

1901968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 401 (Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959) · 29 U.S.C. § 501

Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Healy Nh v. Ratta · Gurton v. Arons · Johnson v. Nelson · Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107 v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “officer, agent, shop steward, or representative of any labor organization.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any relief obtained ... shall benefit the corporation as a whole and not the suing individual directly.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[S]tatutes extending federal jurisdiction, such as Section 501(b), are narrowly construed so as not to reach beyond the limits intended by Congress.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.