Musladin v. Lamarque’s Empirical Analysis
403 F.3d 1072 · 2005
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · Estelle v. Williams · Holbrook v. Flynn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an unmistakable mark of guilt.” See, e.g., Norris, 918 F.2d at 831 ; United States v. Olvera, 30 F.3d 1195 , 1198 (9th Cir.1994) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Musladin v. Lamarque
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.