Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 F.3d 159 - In Re Anthony Bola Olopade

In Re Anthony Bola Olopade’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

3 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive application only if it determines that the application makes a prima facie showing that the application satisfies”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must be certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.