United States v. E Negron-Narvaez’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2023
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Vonn · United States v. Duarte · United States v. Natanel · United States v. Mala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that an error occurred (2) which was clear or obvious and which not only (3) affected the defendant's substantial rights, but also (4) seriously impaired the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the gist of the argument that he makes is not that the district court should have allowed him to withdraw the plea . . . , but, rather, that the court abused its discretion by accepting it in the first place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It protects a defendant 'who is in the position of pleading voluntarily with an understanding of the nature of the charge but without realizing that his conduct does not actually fall within the charge.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.