Power-Tek Solutions Services, LLC v. Techlink, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
403 F.3d 353 · 2005
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Ohayon v. Safeco Insurance · MacDonald v. General Motors Corp. · Lewis v. City of Irvine · Sawchik v. E.I. Dupont Denemours & Co. · 73 Mich. App. 12 - Michigan National Bank v. Holland-Dozier-Holland Sound Studios
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... [t]he state where the thing ... is located will have a natural interest in transactions affecting it. Also the parties will regard the location of the thing ... as important. Indeed, when the thing ... is the principal subject of the contract, it can often be assumed that the parties, to the extent that they thought about the matter at all, would expect that the local law of the state were the thing ... was located would be applied to determine many of the issues arising under the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.