United States v. Tedder’s Empirical Analysis
403 F.3d 836 · 2005
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably United States v. Leahy (2006), United States v. Swanson (2007)
18 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1084 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blockburger v. United States · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Taylor v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although Rule 32.2 offers the defendant a jury trial, this provision ... is limited to the nexus between the funds and the crime; Rule 32.2 does not entitle the accused to a jury’s decision on the amount of forfeiture.”), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1075 , 126 S.Ct. 827 , 163 L.Ed.2d 706 (2005); United States v. Galestro, No. 06-CR-285, 2008 WL 2783360 , at (E.D.N.Y. July 15, 2008) (finding that when a money judgment is sought the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.