Doe v. Cassel’s Empirical Analysis
403 F.3d 986 · 2005
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district courts retain all tools available under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to eliminate meritlesst claims early in the litigation process.”). On remand, the district court may, at its discretion, allow Wealot to amend her complaint to reflect the course of these proceedings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). 5 . Officer Gates's testimony about the gun, at first, was quite specific, explaining: A: I observe him running with the gun, black handgun in his right hand. And I don’t lose sight of him at any point. During my pursuit I am telling him to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wealot v. Brooks“`[T]he Federal Rules do address in Rule 9(b) the question of the need for greater particularity in pleading certain actions, but do not include among the enumerated action any reference to complaints alleging municipal liability under § 1983. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius . . . '”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the non-moving party, or futility of the amendment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.