United States v. Haack’s Empirical Analysis
403 F.3d 997 · 2005
Citation profile
380 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 600 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably United States v. Feemster (2009), United States v. Smith (2006)
380 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 453 · 5 U.S.C. § 3331
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Crosby · Kern v. TXO Production Corp. · United States v. Dalton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 600 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fails to consider a relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or considers only appropriate factors but nevertheless commits a clear error of judgment by arriving at a sentence that lies outside the limited range of choice dictated by the facts of the case.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) a court fails to consider a relevant factor that should have received significant weight; (2) a court gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor; or (3) a court considers only the appropriate factors but in weighing those factors commits a `clear error of judgment.'”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determine the sentence in any manner other than the way the sentence would have been determined pre- Booker.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.