403 F. Supp. 2d 214 - Tuscano v. Tuscano’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “additional element of a communication crossing state lines”). . The Court does not mean to suggest that, had the information on the form pertained to the named Defendants and been incomplete (e.g., omitted reference to Assurance), that this could not support a claim of mail or wire fraud. Here, however, the form does not pertain to the named Defendants at all and one would not expect information on the form to disclose the business affiliations of the named Defendants. . A cause of action for conspiracy to violate RICO under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Robinson v. Fountainhead Title Group Corp.

2. “Obviously, any benefit derived by a corporation through derivative litigation will inure to an individual who owns half of that corporation.... Under New York law, a shareholder derivative action is an appropriate method for one fifty-percent shareholder to obtain relief in the name of the corporation against the other fifty-percent shareholder.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. C.D.S., Inc. v. Zetler

3. “The derivative action may not be maintained if it appears that the plaintiff does not fairly and adequately represent the interests of shareholders or members who are similarly situated in enforcing the right of the corporation or association.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 757 F. Supp. 2d 260 - In Re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative, & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation