403 F. Supp. 2d 68 - DeVaughn v. Inphonic, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Van Dusen v. Barrack · Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. · George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance Company · In re Korean Air Lines Disaster of September 1, 1983
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the plaintiff's choice of forum, unless the balance of convenience is strongly in favor of the defendant; (2) the defendant's choice of forum; (3) whether the claim arose elsewhere; (4) the convenience of the parties; (5) the convenience of the witnesses, but only to the extent that witnesses may be unavailable in one fora; and (6) the ease of access to sources of proof.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“considerations of convenience and the interests of justice weigh in favor of a transfer,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.