403 Ill. App. 3d 839 - Petersen v. Petersen’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 235 Ill. 2d 21 - Blum v. Koster · In re Marriage of Loffredi · 158 Ill. App. 3d 759 - Conner v. Watkins · 339 Ill. App. 3d 743 - In Re Marriage of Waller · 325 Ill. App. 3d 108 - Street v. Street
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The Court expressly reserves the issue of each party's obligation to contribute to the college or other education expenses of the parties' children pursuant to section 513 of the [Act]." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the judgment of dissolution of marriage did not determine whether the parents were required to pay the college expenses of the children (a form of child support), but reserved the issue to be decided in the future,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“petition for allocation of college expenses was in the nature of a modification of child support under section 510 [ (750 ILCS 5/510 (West 2008)) ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.