Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

403 Mass. 1002

Tick v. Tick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1988-08-01

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1993

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-08-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The plaintiff, Sabina Sonya Tick, appeals from the dismissal, for lack of personal jurisdiction and of proper service, of her complaint for contempt. A resident of New York, the plaintiff sought enforcement of a judgment for divorce. The defendant, Eugene E. Tick, is a resident of Connecticut. Having transferred the case to this court on our own motion, we affirm.

¶2We believe that our analysis in Morris v. Morris, ante 1001 (1988), is dispositive. The plaintiff failed to meet the threshold jurisdictional requirement of the Massachusetts long arm statute. Actions as “to all obligations or modifications of alimony, custody, child support or property settlement,” where long arm jurisdiction is sought over the defendant, must be instituted by a resident plaintiff. G. L. c. 223A, § 3 (g) (1986 ed.). See G. L. c. 223A, § 3 (h) (1986 ed. & Supp. 1987); Morris, v. Morris, supra. Thus, it is unnecessary to reach the issues of proper service or of personal jurisdiction over this defendant.

¶3 Judgment affirmed.

/403/mass/1002 · .json · Public domain