Riggins v. Sadowsky’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 166 Ind. App. 521 - Gooch v. Hiatt · Mid America Homes, Inc. v. Horn · 158 Ind. App. 409 - Hough v. Zehrner · 152 Ind. App. 544 - Walker v. Statzer · 134 Ind. App. 48 - Miller Monuments, Inc. v. Asbestos Insulating & Roofing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any transfermen, draymen, and all other persons, firms, or corporations engaged in packing for shipment or storage or transferring, hauling or conveying goods, merchandise, machinery, machines or other articles of value from place to place, or for money paid for freight, storage, or demurrage charges or for erecting machines, machinery, stacks or other equipment, wishing to acquire such a lien upon any of this property, whether the claim be due or not, shall file in the recorder’s office of the county at any time within sixty (60) days after performing such labor or payment of money, described in section one (1) of this act, notice of his intention to hold a lien upon such property for the amount of this claim, setting forth the amount claimed, and a substantial description of the property.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.