Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 N.E.2d 869 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Ashton v. Anderson · Davis v. State · Gradison v. State · Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. Pender

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the original definition of that term, Alvers' instruction was contrary to law and therefore properly refused. In addition, this area was properly covered by instruction No. 15 and the record does not support instruction No. 5. Therefore, the trial court did not err in refusing Alvers' tendered instruction and giving instruction No. 15. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ROBERTSON, P.J., and NEAL, J., concur. 1 . The statute applicable at the time the crime was committed stated:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.